Horse Grooming Supplies  (Forum, Chat Tips & More) Pro Dog Grooming Supplies (Forum, Chat Tips & More) Truck Accessories Direct

Go Back   Truck Forum > Chevy Truck Forum

Reply Chevy Truck Forum - Chevrolet / Chevy trucks and their accessories forum.
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2008, 04:47 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 105
jdfenske is on a distinguished road
crank rating on old school caddys....

what's the torque and hp rating of the old school 472 and 500s from gm at the crank ? everyone spits out wheelbase ratings, that means nothing.

might mount it on one of those screw compressors. it's supposed to have a 100hp electric, but, them's pricey, and i think they're 3phase?


and i don't know which it is, need to look at numbers on the block (never did learn how they were stamped)

i'll be surprised if it's close to 100hp, but, maybe someone here will know.
__________________
1996 Z71 white shortbox tinted
350 30 over
cats and X pipe
Alumhds ported 210 cc runners 62 cc chambers 2" int 1.550" ex
crane lift; 580/580 duration; 216/222
4L60E w/shiftkit
jdfenske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 05:57 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 657
Case 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud ofCase 7230 has much to be proud of
`66-`67 340hp, 480ftlbs torque. `68-`70 375hp, 525ftlbs torque. `72-`73 220hp, 565ftlbs torque.
Case 7230 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 06:12 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
gmctrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 4,624
gmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant futuregmctrucks has a brilliant future
My best friend had a caddy with a 472 I think it was a 1974 model that car would cruise at 100 mph I remember it had a super big gas tank and it felt like a tank when it was full of gas it would sway around I think it needed shocks.
gmctrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 10:54 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
75K30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,291
75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute
You are intending to run a gas internal combustion engine in place of an efficient and clean electric motor?
Used 100 hp motors are dirt cheap, and if you have a motor already, even less expensive to re-wind.
A screw compressor will not have 100% continuous run time, and this will make the gas engine a poor choice for this application. The engine will seldom run at normal operating temps making it terribbly inefficient.
The consumption of gas is going to be incredibly high. Gas prices being what they are should shy you away from this concept.
Designing a coupler for this concept is going to take more than just a set of pulleys here. We are not working with a Briggs 5 hp.
Maintaining proper engine rpm is also going to be an issue. It will have to start at idle, and if it has a direct coupling, it may never start. (cant be the torque of an electri motor) Once you do get it started, you will have to overcome the resistance of the vains under load.
Seems to me that just the fabrication involved would be far greater than just re-winding an existing motor. Even if you had to purchase a new starter for the motor, it would be far less difficult, and quite a bit more cost effective to do so.
460 VAC 3 phase is a dangerous voltage, but is very efficieant for your application.
Probably why large shops dont have gas engines running thier compressors or other equipment.
75K30 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2008, 08:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 980
436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold436'd skylark is a splendid one to behold
if all you need is a measly 100 horse why not use something way smaller anyway. a 500 caddy is slightly overkill. Any 4 banger would probably do it.

You might want to figure out what rpm the compressor requires, and if the motor is capable of producing that much torque at the given rpm..
__________________
Joe
89 K2500 Chevy, Wee-Oh-five 294K miles
1962 Scout 80 parts I guess
1966 Scout 800 resto job
2005 Chevy 2500HD Short cab long box DURAMAX
1996 P30, 6.5 NA Mac Mobile
whole lot of buicks
436'd skylark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 05:07 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 105
jdfenske is on a distinguished road
i doubt that many hp....
__________________
1996 Z71 white shortbox tinted
350 30 over
cats and X pipe
Alumhds ported 210 cc runners 62 cc chambers 2" int 1.550" ex
crane lift; 580/580 duration; 216/222
4L60E w/shiftkit
jdfenske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 05:08 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 105
jdfenske is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by 75K30 View Post
You are intending to run a gas internal combustion engine in place of an efficient and clean electric motor?
Used 100 hp motors are dirt cheap, and if you have a motor already, even less expensive to re-wind.
A screw compressor will not have 100% continuous run time, and this will make the gas engine a poor choice for this application. The engine will seldom run at normal operating temps making it terribbly inefficient.
The consumption of gas is going to be incredibly high. Gas prices being what they are should shy you away from this concept.
Designing a coupler for this concept is going to take more than just a set of pulleys here. We are not working with a Briggs 5 hp.
Maintaining proper engine rpm is also going to be an issue. It will have to start at idle, and if it has a direct coupling, it may never start. (cant be the torque of an electri motor) Once you do get it started, you will have to overcome the resistance of the vains under load.
Seems to me that just the fabrication involved would be far greater than just re-winding an existing motor. Even if you had to purchase a new starter for the motor, it would be far less difficult, and quite a bit more cost effective to do so.
460 VAC 3 phase is a dangerous voltage, but is very efficieant for your application.
Probably why large shops dont have gas engines running thier compressors or other equipment.

not plumbed for 3 phase and 440/460...
__________________
1996 Z71 white shortbox tinted
350 30 over
cats and X pipe
Alumhds ported 210 cc runners 62 cc chambers 2" int 1.550" ex
crane lift; 580/580 duration; 216/222
4L60E w/shiftkit
jdfenske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 03:18 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
75K30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,291
75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdfenske View Post
not plumbed for 3 phase and 440/460...
I actually noticed that I typed 460 VAC, and should have typed 480 VAC, but regardless, obtaining 480 volt service, and a new panel has got to be cheaper both short term, and long term than trying to convert a gas engine.
While in rush currents will be sky high, could you get by with a smaller motor, and lower voltages?
Not expecting 120 VAC here, but what type of service do you actually have?
75K30 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 12:06 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 105
jdfenske is on a distinguished road
220/240

haha, and wont let me post unless 10 or more characters....
__________________
1996 Z71 white shortbox tinted
350 30 over
cats and X pipe
Alumhds ported 210 cc runners 62 cc chambers 2" int 1.550" ex
crane lift; 580/580 duration; 216/222
4L60E w/shiftkit
jdfenske is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 12:18 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
75K30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,291
75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute75K30 has a reputation beyond repute
What make, and model compressor do you have?
75K30 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to Forum and need HELP!! Bad Crank??? 61unibody Toyota Truck Forum 5 08-01-2006 05:37 PM
s10 won' crank steve39475 Chevy Truck Forum 7 03-28-2006 06:14 PM
Truck race gives Speed highest rating ever (Miami Herald) trucknews Truck News (headlines) 0 02-23-2005 07:30 AM
Truck Scales offer 90,000 lb concentrated load rating. (ThomasNet) trucknews Truck News (headlines) 0 12-20-2004 11:30 PM
Chrysler Pacifica earns best SUV rollover rating (Fox 12 Oregon) trucknews Truck News (headlines) 0 08-09-2004 01:30 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.


SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2008 - Truck Forum